The semisimplification principle for Rozansky–Witten invariants

Let XX be a non-compact space whose Rozansky–Witten invariant ZRW[X](M3)Z_{\mathrm{RW}[X]}(M_3) computes invariants associated with a non-semisimple modular tensor category, denoted MTC[X]\operatorname{MTC}[X]. In the equivariant localization formula

ZRW[X](S1×Σg)=λ(S0λ)22g,Z_{\mathrm{RW}[X]}(S^1\times\Sigma_g)=\sum_{\lambda}(S_{0\lambda})^{2-2g},

the labels λ\lambda, equivalently the Bethe vacua in the corresponding expression, are considered. The semisimplification principle. The sum runs over simple modules in the semisimplification of MTC[X]\operatorname{MTC}[X]. This proposal is motivated by examples in which non-semisimple modular categories produce Rozansky–Witten invariants for non-compact targets; its general validity is presented as a suggestion and remains open.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Sergei Gukov, Po-Shen Hsin, Hiraku Nakajima, Sunghyuk Park, Du Pei and Nikita Sopenko, “Rozansky-Witten geometry of Coulomb branches and logarithmic knot invariants”, arXiv:2005.05347 (2020).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.