Homeomorphism conjecture for neohookean energy minimizers

Let p2p\geqslant 2 and q>0q>0. Let Mp(X,Y)\mathscr M^p (\overline{\mathbb{X}},\overline{\mathbb{Y}}) be the class of orientation-preserving monotone mappings h ⁣:X ⁣ ⁣onto ⁣ ⁣Yh\colon\overline{\mathbb{X}}\xrightarrow[]{{}_{\!\!\textnormal{onto\,\,}\!\!}}\overline{\mathbb{Y}} in W1,p(X,C)\mathscr{W}^{1,p}(\mathbb{X},\mathbb{C}), and let hh_\circ be a minimizer of the neohookean energy Eqp\mathsf E_q^p over this class, so that

Eqp[h]=infhMp(X,Y)Eqp[h].\mathsf E_q^p[h_\circ]=\inf_{h\in\mathscr M^p(\overline{\mathbb{X}},\overline{\mathbb{Y}})}\mathsf E_q^p[h].

Homeomorphism conjecture. Every minimizer hMp(X,Y)h_\circ\in\mathscr M^p(\overline{\mathbb{X}},\overline{\mathbb{Y}}) is a homeomorphism.

The conjecture asserts that although monotone Sobolev mappings are used to obtain existence of minimizers when boundary values are free, minimizers do not actually collapse continua and hence remain homeomorphisms. Its status is not resolved in the supplied text.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Tadeusz Iwaniec, Jani Onninen, Pekka Pankka and Teresa Radice, “A Neohookean model of plates”, arXiv:2004.03381 (2020).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.