The inverse-exponent conjecture for multiplier sets

About 6 years old · traced to

Let mm, nn, and kk be positive integers with m≥2m\geq 2, and suppose

M={1,m,m2,…,mn−k−1,mi0,mi1,…,mik−1}.M=\{1,m,m^2,\ldots,m^{n-k-1},m^{i_0},m^{i_1},\ldots,m^{i_{k-1}}\}.

A multiplier set MM splits an abelian group GG if there is a set S⊆GS\subseteq G such that every nonzero element of GG has a unique representation msms with m∈Mm\in M and s∈Ss\in S, while 00 has no such representation. Inverse-exponent conjecture. If MM splits an abelian group GG and ∣M∣=n≥2k+1|M|=n\geq 2k+1, then

{i0,i1,…,ik−1}≡{n−k,n−k+1,…,n−1}(modn).\{i_0,i_1,\ldots,i_{k-1}\}\equiv\{n-k,n-k+1,\ldots,n-1\}\pmod n.

This generalizes the preceding result for k=1k=1; the source notes that the conjecture is known for k≤2k\leq 2, while the general case remains open.

References

Primary source

Kevin Zhao, “The coset factorization of finite cyclic group”, arXiv:2003.14006 (2020).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.