Ross-symbol form of the weak Beilinson conjecture for hypergeometric elliptic curves

Let αQ{0,1}\alpha\in{\mathbb Q}\setminus\{0,1\} and let XαX_\alpha be the elliptic curve in the preceding construction. Let ξRossK2(Xα)(2)\xi_{\mathrm{Ross}}\in K_2(X_\alpha)^{(2)} be the higher Ross symbol, assumed to be integral, and let F12,12(α)\mathscr F_{\frac12,\frac12}(\alpha) denote the hypergeometric function used in the source. Ross-symbol Beilinson conjecture. If ξRoss\xi_{\mathrm{Ross}} is integral, then

Re[F12,12(α)]Q×L(Xα,0).\operatorname{Re}[\mathscr F_{\frac12,\frac12}(\alpha)]\sim_{{\mathbb Q}^\times}L'(X_\alpha,0).

This is obtained in the paper by evaluating the regulator of the Ross symbol and combining that evaluation with the weak Beilinson prediction; it remains conditional on the integrality assumption and the conjectural regulator formula.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Masanori Asakura, “A generalization of the Ross symbols in higher K-groups and hypergeometric functions I”, arXiv:2003.10652 (2021).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.