Planar basis evaluation conjecture for ηJ\eta_J on minimal kinematics

At least 5 years old · documented by

Let Δk,n\Delta_{k,n} be the kkth hypersimplex. For a kk-element subset J⊂{1,…,n}J\subset\{1,\dots,n\}, let ΠJ\Pi_J be the associated polytope obtained by eliminating the block containing nn, and let IaI_a and IbI_b be the subsets constructed from the cyclic block decomposition of JJ, with Ib=J∖Sj−1I_b=J\setminus S_{j-1} and IaI_a the interval of length k−sj−1k-s_{j-1} starting at the cyclically smallest element of SjS_j. Let ηJ\eta_J be the corresponding planar basis element, let xix_i denote the minimal-kinematics variables, and call JJ frozen when ηJ\eta_J vanishes on minimal kinematics. Planar basis evaluation conjecture. For every nonfrozen kk-element subset JJ of {1,…,n}\{1,\dots,n\},

ηJ∣MK=∑i∈Iaxi−∑i∈Ibxi.\left.\eta_J\right|_{\mathrm{MK}}=\sum_{i\in I_a}x_i-\sum_{i\in I_b}x_i.

Moreover, Ia∖IbI_a\setminus I_b and Ib∖IaI_b\setminus I_a are non-crossing; specifically, i<ji<j for every i∈Ia∖Ibi\in I_a\setminus I_b and j∈Ib∖Iaj\in I_b\setminus I_a. For frozen JJ, one has ηJ∣MK=0\left.\eta_J\right|_{\mathrm{MK}}=0. The conjecture gives the proposed evaluation of planar basis elements on minimal kinematics; the supplied text does not state a resolution, so its status remains open.

References

Primary source

Freddy Cachazo and Nick Early, “Minimal Kinematics: An All k and n Peek into Trop^+G(k,n)”, arXiv:2003.07958 (2021).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.