The cofinality conjecture for marked infinity-2-functors

About 6 years old · traced to

Let \mathbfcalC†\mathbfcal{C}^\dagger and \mathbfcalD†\mathbfcal{D}^\dagger be marked (∞,2)(\infty,2)-categories, and let F:\mathbfcalC†→\mathbfcalD†F:\mathbfcal{C}^\dagger\to\mathbfcal{D}^\dagger be a marked (∞,2)(\infty,2)-functor. For each d∈\mathbfcalDd\in\mathbfcal{D}, let (\mathbfcal{C}_{d\!% \mathrel{\text{\rotatebox[origin=c]{65}{\vrule height 2\fontdimen22\textfont2 width 0pt\rightarrow}}} })^\dagger and (\mathbfcal{D}_{d\!% \mathrel{\text{\rotatebox[origin=c]{65}{\vrule height 2\fontdimen22\textfont2 width 0pt\rightarrow}}} })^\dagger denote the marked (∞,2)(\infty,2) slice categories, and let LWL_{\mathcal{W}} denote their (∞,1)(\infty,1)-localization.

The cofinality conjecture. Precomposition with FF preserves marked (∞,2)(\infty,2)-colimits if and only if, for every object d∈\mathbfcalDd\in\mathbfcal{D}: (1) there are c∈\mathbfcalCc\in\mathbfcal{C} and a morphism d→F(c)d\to F(c) initial in the (∞,1)(\infty,1)-localizations of both slices; (2) every marked morphism is initial in L_{\mathcal{W}}((\mathbfcal{C}_{d\!% \mathrel{\text{\rotatebox[origin=c]{65}{\vrule height 2\fontdimen22\textfont2 width 0pt\rightarrow}}} })^\dagger); and (3) for every marked morphism f:d→bf:d\to b, the induced functor

f∗:LW((\mathbfcalCb ⁣\rotatebox[origin=c]65\vruleheight2\fontdimen22\textfont2width0pt→)†)→LW((\mathbfcalCd ⁣\rotatebox[origin=c]65\vruleheight2\fontdimen22\textfont2width0pt→)†)f^\ast:L_{\mathcal{W}}((\mathbfcal{C}_{b\!% \mathrel{\text{\rotatebox[origin=c]{65}{$\vrule height 2\fontdimen22\textfont2 width 0pt\rightarrow$}}} })^\dagger)\to L_{\mathcal{W}}((\mathbfcal{C}_{d\!% \mathrel{\text{\rotatebox[origin=c]{65}{$\vrule height 2\fontdimen22\textfont2 width 0pt\rightarrow$}}} })^\dagger)

preserves initial objects.

This is the paper's main proposed cofinality criterion, motivated by Theorem A and the decategorified criterion for marked 2-colimits. It is formulated using notions that the paper says are not yet rigorously defined in the (∞,2)(\infty,2)-categorical setting, so its proof and precise foundations remain open.

References

Primary source

Fernando Abellán García and Walker H. Stern, “Theorem A for marked 2-categories”, arXiv:2002.12817 (2020).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.