Bertoncello–Levcovitz conjecture on Shamsuddin derivations and isotropy groups

At least 5 years old · documented by

Let K[x1,x2,…,xn]K[x_1,x_2,\ldots,x_n] be a polynomial ring, and let DD be a Shamsuddin derivation, meaning a derivation of the form

D=∂x+∑i=1s∑j=1ri(aiyi,j+bi,j)∂i,j,D=\partial_x+\sum_{i=1}^s\sum_{j=1}^{r_i}(a_i y_{i,j}+b_{i,j})\partial_{i,j},

where ai,bi,j∈K[x]a_i,b_{i,j}\in K[x] and ai≠ala_i\neq a_l for i≠li\neq l. Write

Aut⁡(K[x1,x2,…,xn])D={ρ∈Aut⁡(K[x1,x2,…,xn])∣ρD=Dρ}\operatorname{Aut}(K[x_1,x_2,\ldots,x_n])_D=\{\rho\in\operatorname{Aut}(K[x_1,x_2,\ldots,x_n])\mid \rho D=D\rho\}

for the isotropy subgroup of DD. Bertoncello–Levcovitz conjecture. If DD is a Shamsuddin derivation of K[x1,x2,…,xn]K[x_1,x_2,\ldots,x_n], then DD is simple if and only if

Aut⁡(K[x1,x2,…,xn])D={id⁡}.\operatorname{Aut}(K[x_1,x_2,\ldots,x_n])_D=\{\operatorname{id}\}.

This conjecture proposes that simplicity of a Shamsuddin derivation is equivalent to triviality of its isotropy group. The source notes that triviality of the isotropy group had already been proved for simple Shamsuddin derivations, while the converse remains the proposed direction.

References

Primary source

Dan Yan, “On Shamsuddin derivations and the isotropy groups”, arXiv:2002.00330 (2021).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.