Approximate ERM with constant conditional mutual information

About 6 years old · traced to

Let X\mathcal{X} be a domain, let W\mathcal{W} be a class of functions f:X→{0,1}f:\mathcal{X}\to\{0,1\} with VC dimension d≥1d\geq 1, and let n≥1n\geq 1. For a dataset (x,y)∈(X×{0,1})n(x,y)\in(\mathcal{X}\times\{0,1\})^n, write ℓ(h,(x,y))\ell(h,(x,y)) for the empirical 00-11 loss, and let CMI(A)\mathsf{CMI}(A) denote the conditional mutual information of an algorithm's output. Approximate-ERM CMI conjecture. There exists an absolute constant cc such that, for every such W\mathcal{W} and nn, there is a randomized or deterministic algorithm A:(X×{0,1})n→WA:(\mathcal{X}\times\{0,1\})^n\to\mathcal{W} satisfying

CMI(A)≤cd\mathsf{CMI}(A)\leq c d

and, for every (x,y)∈(X×{0,1})n(x,y)\in(\mathcal{X}\times\{0,1\})^n,

E[ℓ(A(x,y),(x,y))]≤inf⁡h∈Wℓ(h,(x,y))+cdn.\mathbb{E}[\ell(A(x,y),(x,y))]\leq\inf_{h\in\mathcal{W}}\ell(h,(x,y))+c\sqrt{\frac{d}{n}}.

This conjecture concerns the agnostic setting, where a perfectly consistent hypothesis need not exist. The allowed empirical error is of the order of worst-case uniform-convergence error, while removing the logarithmic factor from the known CMI bound may require using an approximate rather than exact empirical risk minimizer.

References

Primary source

Thomas Steinke and Lydia Zakynthinou, “Reasoning About Generalization via Conditional Mutual Information”, arXiv:2001.09122 (2020).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.