Braid group automorphism conjecture for the universal b9c quantum group

About 12 years old · traced to

Let U~ı\widetilde{{\mathbf U}}^\imath be the universal ı\imathquantum group with generators BjB_j and k~j\widetilde{k}_j, indexed by j∈Ij\in\mathbb I. Let τ\tau be the diagram involution and w∙w_\bullet the longest element associated with the finite-type part. For i∈Ii\in\mathbb I satisfying τi=i=w∙i\tau i=i=w_\bullet i, and with e∈{1,−1}e\in\{1,-1\}, let y~i,j;1,−aij,p‾,t‾,e\widetilde{y}_{i,j;1,-a_{ij},\overline{p},\overline{t},e} and y~i,j;1,−aij,p‾,t‾,e′\widetilde{y}'_{i,j;1,-a_{ij},\overline{p},\overline{t},e} be the elements defined by the displayed formulas in the paper.

Braid group automorphism conjecture. For every such ii, there exist mutually inverse algebra automorphisms Ti,e′\mathbf T_{i,e}' and Ti,−e”\mathbf T_{i,-e}” of U~ı\widetilde{{\mathbf U}}^\imath, determined by

Ti,e′(k~j)=(−qi1+ek~i)−aijk~j=Ti,−e”(k~j),∀j∈I,\mathbf T_{i,e}'(\widetilde{k}_j)=(-q_i^{1+e}\widetilde{k}_i)^{-a_{ij}}\widetilde{k}_j=\mathbf T_{i,-e}”(\widetilde{k}_j),\qquad \forall j\in\mathbb I,

and

Ti,e′(Bj)={y~i,j;1,−aij,p‾,t‾,e,j≠i,(−qi1+ek~i)−1Bi,j=i,\mathbf T_{i,e}'(B_j)=\begin{cases}\widetilde{y}_{i,j;1,-a_{ij},\overline{p},\overline{t},e},&j\ne i,\\(-q_i^{1+e}\widetilde{k}_i)^{-1}B_i,&j=i,\end{cases} Ti,−e”(Bj)={y~i,j;1,−aij,p‾,t‾,e′,j≠i,(−qi1+ek~i)−1Bi,j=i.\mathbf T_{i,-e}”(B_j)=\begin{cases}\widetilde{y}'_{i,j;1,-a_{ij},\overline{p},\overline{t},e},&j\ne i,\\(-q_i^{1+e}\widetilde{k}_i)^{-1}B_i,&j=i.\end{cases}

These maps should therefore be well-defined on all defining relations of U~ı\widetilde{{\mathbf U}}^\imath.

The proposed maps are ı\imath-quantum-group analogues of Lusztig's braid group symmetries. The paper notes that even in finite type no braid group action on Uı\mathbf U^\imath-modules is available, and direct verification that these maps are algebra automorphisms is difficult; the conjecture's resolution is not supplied here.

References

Primary source

Xinhong Chen, Ming Lu and Weiqiang Wang, “Serre-Lusztig relations for groups”, arXiv:2001.03818 (2021).

Additional references

2 papers in this index state this conjecture (2014–2020). The statement above is taken from the most recent of them; the others are arXiv:1411.1391.

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.