The versal torsor conjecture for reductive groups over algebraically closed fields

From papers

Let kk be an algebraically closed field, let GG be a connected reductive linear algebraic group over kk, let RR be a regular local ring containing kk, and let

τ ⁣:TSpec(R)\tau\colon T\to\operatorname{Spec}(R)

be a GG-torsor. Let KK be the field of fractions of RR, and let

τK ⁣:TKSpec(K)\tau_K\colon T_K\to\operatorname{Spec}(K)

be the GG-torsor obtained by restricting τ\tau to the generic point of Spec(R)\operatorname{Spec}(R). Assume that the essential dimension of τK\tau_K over kk is dd, written edk(τK)=d\operatorname{ed}_k(\tau_K)=d. Versal torsor conjecture. There exists a Cartesian diagram of kk-morphisms

\xymatrix{ T \ar@{->}[d]_{\tau} \ar@{->}[rr] & & W \ar@{->}[d]^{\nu} \\ \operatorname{Spec}(R) \ar@{->}[rr] & & Y, }

where YY is a dd-dimensional integral scheme of finite type over kk and ν\nu is a GG-torsor.

The claim is a proposed variant of the Grothendieck-Serre conjecture, relating the essential dimension of the generic torsor to a finite-type geometric model over the base field. The supplied source gives no resolution or partial status for this proposed statement.

Progress summary

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Zinovy Reichstein and Dajano Tossici, “Special groups, versality and the Grothendieck-Serre conjecture”, arXiv:1912.08109 (2020).

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.