The disjoint-interval density conjecture

Let μ\mu be an absolutely continuous probability measure supported on [0,1][0,1] with density ff. Assume there exist C>0C>0 and p>1p>1 such that, for all 0<r<R<10<r<R<1 and xx in the support of μ\mu,

μ(B(x,R))μ(B(x,r))C(Rr)11/p.\frac{\mu(B(x,R))}{\mu(B(x,r))}\geqslant C\left(\frac{R}{r}\right)^{1-1/p}.

Let {Ii}\{I_i\} be a finite set of pairwise disjoint intervals satisfying μ(Ii)ϱλ(Ii)\mu(I_i)\geqslant\varrho\lambda(I_i), where λ\lambda is Lebesgue measure. Assume additionally that C1C\geqslant1. Disjoint-interval density conjecture. Then

ϱp1i=1Nλ(Ii).\varrho^{\,p}\lesssim\frac{1}{\sum_{i=1}^N\lambda(I_i)}.

This is suggested by an attempted iteration of the preceding lemma for combining separated intervals. The authors state that they were unable to prove such an iteration, and no resolution of this proposed statement is given.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Jonathan M. Fraser and Sascha Troscheit, “Regularity versus smoothness of measures”, arXiv:1912.07292 (2019).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.