The conjecture that there are no strictly n-dependent fields

For n    2n\thickspace\geq\thickspace 2, a theory is strictly nn-dependent if it is nn-dependent but not (n1)(n-1)-dependent. The fields under consideration are in the pure ring language.

No strictly nn-dependent fields conjecture. There are no strictly nn-dependent fields for n2n\geq 2.

Equivalently, every nn-dependent field is dependent. The conjecture is motivated by known results including Artin–Schreier closedness of infinite nn-dependent fields and the failure of nn-dependence for non-separable PAC fields. The supplied text gives no resolution of the conjecture.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Artem Chernikov and Nadja Hempel, “On n-dependent groups and fields II”, arXiv:1912.02385 (2021).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.