Tateness conjecture for motivic classes of translation quiver representation spaces

Let QQ be a quiver with an automorphism \ta\ta, let \bv\bN(Q0)\bv\in\bN^{(Q_0)} be a dimension vector, and let \cR\ta(Q,\bv)\cR^\ta(Q,\bv) denote the space of pairs (M,\vi)(M,\vi) with M\cR(Q,\bv)M\in\cR(Q,\bv) and \viHom(M,M\ta)\vi\in\operatorname{Hom}(M,M^\ta). Tateness conjecture. The motivic class of \cR\ta(Q,\bv)\cR^\ta(Q,\bv) is Tate. This conjecture predicts that these motivic classes lie in the Tate subring of the relevant Grothendieck ring; the supplied text does not state any cases in which the claim is proved or refuted.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Sergey Mozgovoy, “Translation quiver varieties”, arXiv:1911.01788 (2022).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.