Degenerate supergroup conjecture for the geometric Langlands limit

Let N>MN>M, let \Gr\GLN\Gr_{\GL_N} be the affine Grassmannian, and let \ul\GL(MN)\ul\GL(M|N) be the group introduced in the source as the appropriate extension governing the cc\to\infty limit. Let UM,N(\bF)U_{M,N}(\bF) and χM,N\chi_{M,N} be as above. Degenerate supergroup conjecture. For N>MN>M,

D(\GL(M,\bO)UM,N(\bF),χM,N)(\Gr\GLN)D^{(\GL(M,\bO)\ltimes U_{M,N}(\bF),\chi_{M,N})}(\Gr_{\GL_N})

is equivalent to the category of modules over the group \ul\GL(MN)\ul\GL(M|N). For N=MN=M,

D\GL(N,\bO)(\Gr\GLN×\bV)D^{\GL(N,\bO)}(\Gr_{\GL_N}\times\bV)

is equivalent to the category of modules over \ul\GL(NN)\ul\GL(N|N). These equivalences should hold for both derived and abelian categories. This conjecture describes the proposed cc\to\infty limit, where twisted DD-modules become ordinary DD-modules; the source explains that the ordinary supergroup \GL(MN)\GL(M|N) is not the correct limiting object and instead uses the degenerate group \ul\GL(MN)\ul\GL(M|N).

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Alexander Braverman, Michael Finkelberg, Victor Ginzburg and Roman Travkin, “Mirabolic Satake equivalence and supergroups”, arXiv:1909.11492 (2021).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.