Regularity-independence conjecture for higher secondary polytopes

From papers

Let A\mathcal{A} be a point configuration, let V\mathcal{V} be its associated vector configuration, and let \UpsigmaA,k\Upsigma_{\mathcal{A},k} be the higher secondary polytope defined using fine regular zonotopal tilings of ZV\mathcal{Z}_{\mathcal{V}}. For a fine zonotopal tiling TT, write vert^k(T)\widehat{\operatorname{vert}}_k(T) for its associated vector. The regularity-independence conjecture.

\UpsigmaA,k=conv{vert^k(T)  |  T is a fine zonotopal tiling of ZV}.\Upsigma_{\mathcal{A},k}=\operatorname{conv}\left\{\widehat{\operatorname{vert}}_k(T)\;\middle|\; T\text{ is a fine zonotopal tiling of }\mathcal{Z}_{\mathcal{V}}\right\}.

Equivalently, vert^k(T)\widehat{\operatorname{vert}}_k(T) lies in \UpsigmaA,k\Upsigma_{\mathcal{A},k} for every fine, not necessarily regular, zonotopal tiling TT. The conjecture would show that regularity can be omitted from the definition of the higher secondary polytope; the supplied source gives no resolution.

Progress summary

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Pavel Galashin, Alexander Postnikov and Lauren Williams, “Higher secondary polytopes and regular plabic graphs”, arXiv:1909.05435 (2019).

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.