Conjecture on limit shapes for bead and exponential stochastic interfaces

From papers

Let S=[0,1]2S=[0,1]^2, and let ϕN\phi^N be a stochastic interface model on SNS_N with interaction potential V=beadV=\mathsf{bead} or V=expV=\mathsf{\exp}. Suppose its weight functions are

W(i,j)N(u)=1i=jμu+1i=j=NNfN(u/N),W_{(i,j)}^N(u)=\mathbf{1}_{i=j}\mu u+\mathbf{1}_{i=j=N}Nf_N(u/N),

where fN(u)1uAf_N(u)\to\infty\mathbf{1}_{u\notin A} as NN\to\infty and mu>0mu>0. If the associated partition functions satisfy N2logZNERN^{-2}\log Z_N\to E\in\mathbb{R}, let ϕˉN\bar\phi^N be the rescaled interface and let σV\sigma^V be the surface tension. Limit-shape conjecture. The rescaled interface converges pointwise almost surely to a deterministic function ξC1(S)\xi\in\mathcal{C}^1(S), which minimizes

E[v]=SσV(v(s,t))dsdt+μ01v(s,s)ds+1v(1,1)A+E,\mathcal{E}[v]=\int_S\sigma^V(\nabla v(s,t))\,ds\,dt+\mu\int_0^1v(s,s)\,ds+\infty\mathbf{1}_{v(1,1)\notin A}+E,

and E[ξ]=0\mathcal{E}[\xi]=0. This prediction is conditional on the proposed existence of the exponential surface tension and extends the variational description known for more regular interaction potentials; the supplied text does not provide a proof.

Progress summary

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Samuel G. G. Johnston and Neil O'Connell, “Scaling limits for non-intersecting polymers and Whittaker measures”, arXiv:1909.03219 (2019).

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.