Ihara's lemma for generic irreducible submodules

Let F+F^+ be the totally real field in the global setup, let GG be the associated group, and let UG(AF+)U\subset G(\mathbb{A}_{F^+}^{\infty}) be sufficiently small. Let v0T(SS(B)Sa)v_0\in T-(S_{\ell}\cup S(B)\cup S_a) satisfy Uv0G(OFv0+)U_{v_0}\cong G(\mathcal{O}_{F_{v_0}^+}), let mTT(U)\mathfrak{m}\subset\mathbb{T}^T(U) be a non-Eisenstein maximal ideal, and let fS(U,k)[m]f\in S(U,k)[\mathfrak{m}]. If π\pi is an irreducible k[G(Fv0+)]k[G(F_{v_0}^+)]-submodule of

G(Fv0+)fS(Uv0,k),\langle G(F_{v_0}^+)\cdot f\rangle\subset S(U^{v_0},k),

Ihara's lemma. Then π\pi is generic. This is the precise weak Ihara lemma attributed in the source to Clozel, Harris, and Taylor. The introduction explains that the corresponding Ihara conjecture is known for n=2n=2 but remains open for n>2n>2; no resolution is supplied here.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Gilbert Moss, “The universal unramified module for GL(n) and the Ihara conjecture”, arXiv:1909.02709 (2020).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.