The second analytic Langlands conjecture on discreteness of the joint spectrum

Let GG be a complex reductive group, let XX be a complex curve, and let A=DGCDG\mathcal A=D_G\otimes_{\mathbb C}\overline{D}_G act on H=L2(BunG)\mathcal H=L^2(\operatorname{Bun}_G). Denote by SpecA(H)\operatorname{Spec}_{\mathcal A}(\mathcal H) the joint spectrum of this commuting algebra.

Second analytic Langlands conjecture. The spectrum SpecA(H)\operatorname{Spec}_{\mathcal A}(\mathcal H) is discrete; equivalently, H\mathcal H is the completed direct sum of finite-dimensional eigenspaces of A\mathcal A.

Discreteness would make the analytic Langlands spectral decomposition a genuinely discrete decomposition into joint eigensections. The conjecture is proved in the abelian case and in the simplest non-abelian case considered in the paper, but no general proof is stated.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Pavel Etingof, Edward Frenkel and David Kazhdan, “An analytic version of the Langlands correspondence for complex curves”, arXiv:1908.09677 (2021).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.