The second analytic Langlands conjecture on discreteness of the joint spectrum

About 7 years old · traced to

Let GG be a complex reductive group, let XX be a complex curve, and let A=DG⊗CD‾G\mathcal A=D_G\otimes_{\mathbb C}\overline{D}_G act on H=L2(Bun⁡G)\mathcal H=L^2(\operatorname{Bun}_G). Denote by Spec⁡A(H)\operatorname{Spec}_{\mathcal A}(\mathcal H) the joint spectrum of this commuting algebra.

Second analytic Langlands conjecture. The spectrum Spec⁡A(H)\operatorname{Spec}_{\mathcal A}(\mathcal H) is discrete; equivalently, H\mathcal H is the completed direct sum of finite-dimensional eigenspaces of A\mathcal A.

Discreteness would make the analytic Langlands spectral decomposition a genuinely discrete decomposition into joint eigensections. The conjecture is proved in the abelian case and in the simplest non-abelian case considered in the paper, but no general proof is stated.

References

Primary source

Pavel Etingof, Edward Frenkel and David Kazhdan, “An analytic version of the Langlands correspondence for complex curves”, arXiv:1908.09677 (2021).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.