The kk-partite planted clique conjecture

From papers

Fix a constant p(0,1)p\in(0,1). Let ntn_t and ktk_t be increasing sequences of positive integers such that kt=o(nt)k_t=o(\sqrt{n_t}) and ktk_t divides ntn_t, and let

At:Gnt{0,1}\mathcal{A}_t:\mathcal{G}_{n_t}\to\{0,1\}

be a sequence of randomized polynomial-time algorithms. Under H0H_0, GG is sampled from the null distribution, while under H1H_1 it is sampled from the ktk_t-partite planted-clique distribution k-pc(nt,kt,p)k\text{-pc}(n_t,k_t,p). kk-partite planted clique conjecture. If GtG_t is an instance of k-pc(nt,kt,p)k\text{-pc}(n_t,k_t,p), then

lim inft(PH0[At(G)=1]+PH1[At(G)=0])1.\liminf_{t\to\infty}\left(\mathbb{P}_{H_0}[\mathcal{A}_t(G)=1]+\mathbb{P}_{H_1}[\mathcal{A}_t(G)=0]\right)\geq 1.

Thus no such sequence of algorithms distinguishes the planted and null distributions with asymptotic error sum below 11; this is the formal hardness assumption used by the paper's reductions, and the source gives no resolution.

Progress summary

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Matthew Brennan and Guy Bresler, “Average-Case Lower Bounds for Learning Sparse Mixtures, Robust Estimation and Semirandom Adversaries”, arXiv:1908.06130 (2020).

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.