Coherence-band gradient similarity conjecture for one-bit millimetre-wave channel estimation

Let hh be the objective function, let xix_i and xjx_j denote its ii-th and jj-th channel coefficients, and let ablah(xi) abla h(x_i) and ablah(xj) abla h(x_j) denote the corresponding \partial gradients. For sensing vectors ai\mathbf{a}_i and aj\mathbf{a}_j, define their coherence by

μ(i,j)=aiHajaiaj.\mu(i,j)=\frac{|\mathbf{a}_i^{\mathrm{H}}\mathbf{a}_j|}{\\|\mathbf{a}_i\\|\\|\mathbf{a}_j\\|}.

For η(0,1)\eta\in(0,1), the η\eta-coherence band of ii is

Bη(i)=jμ(i,j)η.B_{\eta}(i)=\\{j\mid \mu(i,j)\geq\eta\\}.

Coherence-band gradient similarity conjecture. For sufficiently large η\eta, if jBη(i)j\in B_{\eta}(i) and xi=xjx_i=x_j, then

h(xi)h(xj).\nabla h(x_i)\approx\nabla h(x_j).

The claim is intended to explain support-identification failure when the sensing matrix has highly coherent columns: coefficients with equal values and highly coherent associated sensing vectors are expected to have approximately equal gradients. The source presents this as a conjecture, without supplying a resolution.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

In-soo Kim and Junil Choi, “Gradient Pursuit-Based Channel Estimation for MmWave Massive MIMO Systems with One-Bit ADCs”, arXiv:1908.00508 (2019).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.