Equal centralizer and commutator counts imply isoclinism
Let and be finite groups. Write and for their commutator subgroups, and let denote the set of centralizers of elements of .
Centralizer–commutator conjecture. If
then is isoclinic to .
The question is posed after counterexamples showing that equality of the numbers of centralizers alone does not imply isoclinism. The conjecture asks whether adding equality of the orders of the commutator subgroups is sufficient; no resolution is supplied in the source.
References
Primary source
K. Khoramshahi and M. Zarrin, “groups with the same number of centralizers”, arXiv:1906.09424 (2019).
Progress summary
Never refreshed
Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.
Solutions 0
No solutions have been posted yet.