Non-Cohen–Macaulay invariant rings and normality of the dual nilpotent cone

Let GG be a reductive group over a field of positive characteristic pp, let h\mathfrak{h} be a Cartan subalgebra with Weyl group WW, and let Ng\mathcal{N}^*\subseteq \mathfrak{g}^* be the dual nilpotent cone. Suppose that the invariant ring S(h)WS(\mathfrak{h})^W is not Cohen–Macaulay.

Non-normality question. Is the dual nilpotent cone N\mathcal{N}^* not a normal variety?

The question asks whether failure of the Cohen–Macaulay property for the invariant ring obstructs normality of the dual nilpotent cone. The paper notes that non-Cohen–Macaulay invariant rings occur in cases such as (E7,3)(E_7,3), (E8,3)(E_8,3), and (E8,5)(E_8,5), but does not resolve the question in general.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Richard Mathers, “Normality of the dual nilcone in positive characteristic”, arXiv:1906.04460 (2020).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.