The motivic analogue of the Tate conjecture

About 7 years old · traced to

Assume that the field kk is finitely generated, and let MM be a motive over kk. Write Gℓ,k(M)\mathop{\mathrm{G}}_{\ell,k}(M) for the ℓ\ell-adic monodromy group of MM, and Gk(M)\mathop{\mathrm{G}}_k(M) for its motivic Tannaka group. The notation Gk(M)Qℓ\mathop{\mathrm{G}}_k(M)_{\mathbb{Q}_\ell} denotes base change to Qℓ\mathbb{Q}_\ell. Motivic Tate conjecture. The equality

Gℓ,k(M)=Gk(M)Qℓ\mathop{\mathrm{G}}_{\ell,k}(M)=\mathop{\mathrm{G}}_k(M)_{\mathbb{Q}_\ell}

should hold for every prime ℓ\ell. This is stronger than the classical ℓ\ell-adic Tate conjecture for a smooth projective variety, since it asserts that all Tate classes in all cohomology groups of all powers of the variety are motivated cycle classes.

References

Primary source

Victoria Cantoral Farfán and Johan Commelin, “The Mumford-Tate conjecture implies the algebraic Sato-Tate conjecture of Banaszak and Kedlaya”, arXiv:1905.04086 (2020).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.