The motivic analogue of the Tate conjecture

Assume that the field kk is finitely generated, and let MM be a motive over kk. Write G,k(M)\mathop{\mathrm{G}}_{\ell,k}(M) for the \ell-adic monodromy group of MM, and Gk(M)\mathop{\mathrm{G}}_k(M) for its motivic Tannaka group. The notation Gk(M)Q\mathop{\mathrm{G}}_k(M)_{\mathbb{Q}_\ell} denotes base change to Q\mathbb{Q}_\ell. Motivic Tate conjecture. The equality

G,k(M)=Gk(M)Q\mathop{\mathrm{G}}_{\ell,k}(M)=\mathop{\mathrm{G}}_k(M)_{\mathbb{Q}_\ell}

should hold for every prime \ell. This is stronger than the classical \ell-adic Tate conjecture for a smooth projective variety, since it asserts that all Tate classes in all cohomology groups of all powers of the variety are motivated cycle classes.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Victoria Cantoral Farfán and Johan Commelin, “The Mumford-Tate conjecture implies the algebraic Sato-Tate conjecture of Banaszak and Kedlaya”, arXiv:1905.04086 (2020).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.