The spin-chain equivalence conjecture for the infinite Temperley–Lieb algebra

Let w0,w1w_{0},w_{1} be link states, let S(w0)\mathcal{S}(w_{0}) and S(w1)\mathcal{S}(w_{1}) be the associated spin-chain representations, and define

Fw0,w1:RepUq(sl2)RepTL\mathcal{F}_{w_{0},w_{1}}: \operatorname{Rep} U_{q}(\mathfrak{sl}_{2})\longrightarrow \operatorname{Rep} TL_{\infty}

by Fw0,w1():=Hom(,S(w0)S(w1))\mathcal{F}_{w_{0},w_{1}}(-):=\operatorname{Hom}(-,\mathcal{S}(w_{0})\oplus\mathcal{S}(w_{1})). Let C(w0,w1)\mathcal{C}(w_{0},w_{1}) be the Serre subcategory generated by finitely generated TL(q+q1)TL_{\infty}(q+q^{-1}) representations generated by link states that differ from w0w_{0} or w1w_{1} at only finitely many points. Spin-chain equivalence conjecture. The functor Fw0,w1\mathcal{F}_{w_{0},w_{1}} defines an equivalence of abelian categories between the category of finite dimensional Uq(sl2)U_{q}(\mathfrak{sl}_{2}) representations and C(w0,w1)\mathcal{C}(w_{0},w_{1}).

This conjecture predicts that the finite-dimensional representation theory of Uq(sl2)U_{q}(\mathfrak{sl}_{2}) is categorically realized by the specified Serre subcategory of representations of the infinite Temperley–Lieb algebra. The supplied text gives no evidence that the conjecture has been proved or refuted.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Stephen T. Moore, “On the Representation theory of the Infinite Temperley-Lieb algebra”, arXiv:1904.12301 (2019).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.