Simplex Calderón–Zygmund form conjecture

Let V=Rd\mathbb{V}=\mathbb{R}^{\mathscr{d}}, and let F0,,FnF_{0},\dotsc,F_{n} be functions of nn variables. For x=(x0,,xn)Vn+1x=(x_{0},\dotsc,x_{n})\in\mathbb{V}^{n+1}, write x(i)=(x0,,xi1,xi+1,,xn)x_{(i)}=(x_{0},\dotsc,x_{i-1},x_{i+1},\dotsc,x_{n}). Define

ΛK(F0,,Fn)=Vn+1i=0nFi(x(i))K(i=0nxi)dx.\Lambda_{K}(F_{0},\dotsc,F_{n})=\int_{\mathbb{V}^{n+1}}\prod_{i=0}^{n}F_{i}(x_{(i)})K\left(\sum_{i=0}^{n}x_{i}\right)\,\mathrm{d}x.

Suppose that KK is a sufficiently smooth Calderón–Zygmund kernel.

Simplex Calderón–Zygmund form conjecture. Then

ΛK(F0,,Fn)i=0nFipi,i=0n1pi=1,n<pi<.\left|\Lambda_{K}(F_{0},\dotsc,F_{n})\right|\lesssim\prod_{i=0}^{n}\|F_{i}\|_{p_{i}},\qquad \sum_{i=0}^{n}\frac{1}{p_{i}}=1,\qquad n<p_{i}<\infty.

This is presented as the most optimistic conjecture for multidimensional modulation-invariant operators consistent with the negative results discussed in the paper. Its status is open in the stated generality.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Pavel Zorin-Kranich, “Modulation invariant operators”, arXiv:1902.10577 (2019).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.