Properness conjecture for commuting maps on incidence algebras

About 7 years old · traced to

Let (X,⩽)(X,\leqslant) be a locally finite pre-ordered set, let R\mathcal{R} be a 22-torsion-free commutative ring with unity, and let I(X,R)I(X,\mathcal{R}) denote the incidence algebra of XX over R\mathcal{R}. For each connected component of XX, let D\mathfrak{D} be the associated set, with equivalence relation ≅\cong. A map θ:I(X,R)→I(X,R)\theta:I(X,\mathcal{R})\to I(X,\mathcal{R}) is proper if it has the form θ(f)=λf+μ(f)\theta(f)=\lambda f+\mu(f), where λ∈R\lambda\in\mathcal{R} and μ\mu is a central-valued additive map. Properness conjecture. If the set D\mathfrak{D} associated with each connected component forms one equivalent class under the relation ≅\cong, then every commuting map of I(X,R)I(X,\mathcal{R}) is proper. The preceding theorem establishes the claim when XX is connected; the conjecture extends this to locally finite pre-ordered sets with finitely or arbitrarily many connected components, and the general case is left open.

References

Primary source

Hongyu Jia and Zhankui Xiao, “Commuting maps on certain incidence algebras”, arXiv:1902.03396 (2019).

Additional references

2 papers in this index state this conjecture (2019). The statement above is taken from the most recent of them; the others are arXiv:1901.05690.

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.