Vanishing and leading-term conjecture for generalized regularization q-decomposition numbers

Let aa and bb be positive integers. Let λ\lambda and μ\mu be partitions of the same size, with λ\lambda Rega,b\operatorname{Reg}_{a,b}-valid and μ\mu (a,b)(a,b)-regular. Write dλ,μ(q)d_{\lambda,\mu}(q) for the corresponding qq-decomposition number, let \trianglelefteq denote dominance order, and let s(λ)s(\lambda) be the number of (a,b)(a,b)-steep hooks of λ\lambda divisible by bb. Generalized regularization q-decomposition conjecture. If λRega,bμ\lambda^{\operatorname{Reg}_{a,b}}\ntrianglelefteq\mu, then

dλ,μ(q)=0.d_{\lambda,\mu}(q)=0.

Moreover,

dλ,λRega,b(q)=qs(λ).d_{\lambda,\lambda^{\operatorname{Reg}_{a,b}}}(q)=q^{s(\lambda)}.

This conjecture predicts a dominance-order vanishing criterion and an explicit leading coefficient for the generalized regularization term in the qq-decomposition matrix. It is motivated by the relationship between the Mullineux involution, generalized regularization, and crystal-basis qq-decomposition numbers.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Allen Wang and Guangyi Yue, “Relationship Between Mullineux Involution and the Generalized Regularization”, arXiv:1812.07732 (2019).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.