Converse to the Bridgeland stability criterion for deformed Hermitian–Yang–Mills

About 8 years old · traced to

Let (X,ω)(X,\omega) be a Kähler 33-fold and let L→XL\to X be a holomorphic line bundle. Assume that LL admits a solution of the deformed Hermitian–Yang–Mills equation with lifted angle θ^∈(π,3π2)\hat{\theta}\in(\pi,\frac{3\pi}{2}). Let ZV(L)Z_V(L) and φV(L)\varphi_V(L) denote the central charge and slicing angle associated to every irreducible analytic subset V⊂XV\subset X, and let H=z∈C:Im(z)>0\mathbb H=\\{z\in\mathbb C:{\rm Im}(z)>0\\}. Proposition~ asserts, in particular, the corresponding upper-half-plane and angle inequalities. Converse conjecture. The converse of Proposition~ holds. This updates a conjecture from Collins–Jacob–Yau; its small-radius limit for ample line bundles was proved by Collins and Székelyhidi, but the full converse remains unresolved in the supplied source.

References

Primary source

Tristan C. Collins and Shing-Tung Yau, “Moment maps, nonlinear PDE, and stability in mirror symmetry”, arXiv:1811.04824 (2018).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.