Convexity and endpoint maximum conjecture for spiderweb central configurations

For circles of equal mass, let nNn\in\mathbb N and N2\ell\in\mathbb N_{\geq 2}, and write

ai=ri+1()ri()r1(),1in1,a_i=\frac{r_{i+1}(\ell)-r_i(\ell)}{r_1(\ell)},\qquad 1\leq i\leq n-1,

for the relative spacing between consecutive circles. Let aia_{i^*} be the maximum of the sequence (ai)1in1(a_i)_{1\leq i\leq n-1}.

Convexity and endpoint maximum conjecture. The sequence (ai)1in1(a_i)_{1\leq i\leq n-1} is convex. It is strictly increasing when =2\ell=2, and only when =2\ell=2. Moreover, there exists an increasing function μ:NN\mu:\mathbb N\longrightarrow\mathbb N such that

i={1,if μ(n), 1,if <μ(n),i^*=\begin{cases}1,&\text{if }\ell\geq\mu(n),\ -1,&\text{if }\ell<\mu(n),\end{cases}

and in particular i=1i^*=1 whenever n\ell\geq n.

The convexity forces the maximum to occur at an endpoint, while the claimed function μ\mu specifies which endpoint occurs. The statement is motivated by numerical experiments; the source does not establish it analytically, so its status remains open.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Olivier Hénot and Christiane Rousseau, “Spiderweb central configurations”, arXiv:1810.09915 (2018).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.