The Bruhat trajectory conjecture for non-split real forms
The Bruhat trajectory conjecture for non-split real forms
Let be the Weyl group associated with a non-split real form, and let be invariant points of the Toda system. For a Bruhat comparison, write
Bruhat trajectory conjecture. There exist trajectories connecting and if and only if the corresponding elements are comparable in Bruhat order. In that case, the space of such trajectories coincides with the intersection of the Bruhat cell and the dual Bruhat cell, and its dimension is
In particular, this sum does not depend on the choice of the reflections in this formula.
This conjecture extends the trajectory-intersection description from split real forms to non-split real forms, where real Bruhat cells need not be identified directly with the real parts of complex cells and root spaces may have dimension greater than one.
Sources & referencesView supporting material
Primary source
Yuri B. Chernyakov, Georgy I. Sharygin, Alexander S. Sorin and Dmitry V. Talalaev, “The Full Symmetric Toda Flow and Intersections of Bruhat Cells”, arXiv:1810.09622 (2020).
Progress summary
Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.
Solutions 0
Sign in to submit a solution.
No solutions have been posted yet.