The general-position criterion for generalised Gelfand–Graev representations

Let GG be a finite reductive group with Frobenius endomorphism FF, let kk be the underlying field of characteristic pp, and let dΔ d\in\Delta index the corresponding grading of the Lie algebra. Write gd(i)\mathfrak{g}_d(i) for its degree-ii component and let σλ\sigma_\lambda be the alternating form on gd(1)\mathfrak{g}_d(1) associated with a linear map λ ⁣:gd(2)k\lambda\colon\mathfrak{g}_d(2)\to k. Let Δk ⁣\Delta_k^{\!\bullet} denote the set of indices for which the associated form can be non-degenerate. General-position criterion. For every dΔd\in\Delta, dΔk ⁣d\in\Delta_k^{\!\bullet} if and only if either

gd(1)={0},\mathfrak{g}_d(1)=\{0\},

or there exists a linear map λ ⁣:gd(2)k\lambda\colon\mathfrak{g}_d(2)\to k such that the radical of σλ\sigma_\lambda is zero. This characterises precisely when the corresponding generalised Gelfand–Graev construction admits the required non-degenerate alternating form; the paper presents it as suggested by the preceding examples, and no resolution is supplied.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Meinolf Geck, “Generalised Gelfand–Graev representations in bad characteristic?”, arXiv:1810.08937 (2018).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.