The Ω-divergence conjecture for non-periodic E-sequences

Let (an)n1(a_n)_{n\geqslant 1} be an E-sequence, meaning an infinite sequence of positive integers, and define

bn=i=1nai.b_n=\sum_{i=1}^n a_i.

An E-sequence is Ω-convergent to an odd positive integer xx if it is the E-sequence of xx under the 3x+13x+1 iteration, and it is Ω-divergent if it is not the E-sequence of any odd positive integer. The Ω-divergence conjecture. (i) Every non-periodic E-sequence is Ω-divergent; (ii) every E-sequence (an)n1(a_n)_{n\geqslant 1} satisfying

3n>2bnfor all nN3^n>2^{b_n}\qquad\text{for all }n\in\mathbb{N}

is Ω-divergent. The first assertion connects periodicity of trajectories with the behavior of generalized E-sequences, while the second gives a sufficient growth condition for Ω-divergence. The source provides no resolution of either assertion.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

SanMin Wang, “An E-sequence approach to the 3x + 1 problem”, arXiv:1809.02278 (2019).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.