Conjecture on analytic tangent cones of admissible Hermitian–Yang–Mills connections

Let AA be an admissible Hermitian–Yang–Mills connection on (E,B)(\mathcal{E},B), and let E^\hat{\mathcal{E}} be any chosen optimal extension of E\mathcal{E} at 00. An analytic tangent-cone conjecture. There is a unique analytic tangent cone (E,A,Σan,μ)(\mathcal{E}_\infty,A_\infty,\Sigma^{an},\mu) on Cn\mathbb{C}^n of (E,A)(\mathcal{E},A) at 00, where (E,A)(\mathcal{E}_\infty,A_\infty) is a Hermitian–Yang–Mills cone, Σan\Sigma^{an} is the bubbling set, and μ\mu is the limiting measure. Moreover,

Eψπ((GrHNS(E^))),\mathcal{E}_\infty\simeq\psi'_*\pi'^*((\operatorname{Gr}^{HNS}(\underline{\hat{\mathcal{E}}}))^{**}), Σan=π1(Sing(GrHNS(E^))),\Sigma^{an}=\pi'^{-1}(\operatorname{Sing}(\operatorname{Gr}^{HNS}(\underline{\hat{\mathcal{E}}}))),

and for each irreducible component of Σan\Sigma^{an} of pure complex codimension 22, the analytic multiplicity assigned by μ\mu equals the algebraic multiplicity. This conjecture predicts that the analytic tangent cone and bubbling data are uniquely determined by the algebraic optimal extension and its Harder–Narasimhan–Seshadri graded object.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Xuemiao Chen and Song Sun, “Algebraic tangent cones of reflexive sheaves”, arXiv:1808.02172 (2018).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.