Anisotropic KPZ conjecture for two-dimensional interface growth

Let v=v(ρ)v=v(\rho) be the slope-dependent asymptotic growth speed for a two-dimensional stochastic interface, with local average slope ρR2\rho\in\mathbb R^2. Let α\alpha and β\beta denote the roughness and growth exponents, and let the Edwards–Wilkinson exponents be

αEW(2)=0,βEW(2)=0.\alpha_{EW}(2)=0,\qquad \beta_{EW}(2)=0.

Anisotropic KPZ conjecture. If the Hessian matrix D2v(ρ)D^2v(\rho) has two eigenvalues of the same sign, equivalently if det(D2v(ρ))>0\det(D^2v(\rho))>0, then

ααEW(2)=0,ββEW=0.\alpha\ne\alpha_{EW}(2)=0,\qquad \beta\ne\beta_{EW}=0.

If instead det(D2v(ρ))0\det(D^2v(\rho))\leq 0, then

α=αEW(2)=0,β=βEW=0.\alpha=\alpha_{EW}(2)=0,\qquad \beta=\beta_{EW}=0.

This conjecture predicts that the sign structure of the Hessian of the growth speed distinguishes genuinely anisotropic KPZ behavior from Edwards–Wilkinson behavior in two dimensions. The statement is presented as an expectation for the long-time fluctuation exponents of the stochastic growth models considered in the paper.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Alexei Borodin and Fabio Lucio Toninelli, “Two-dimensional Anisotropic KPZ growth and limit shapes”, arXiv:1806.10467 (2018).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.