Cohomological-building-block conjecture for integral-character unitary representations of \mathrm{Sp}p,qp,q

From papers

Let GR=Sp(p,q)G_{\mathbb R}=\mathrm{Sp}(p,q), and suppose that π\pi is a unitary representation of GRG_{\mathbb R} with integral infinitesimal character. A θ\theta-stable parabolic subalgebra is a decomposition q=lu\mathfrak{q}=\mathfrak{l}\oplus\mathfrak{u} stable under the Cartan involution; write LRL_{\mathbb R} for the normalizer of l\mathfrak{l} in GRG_{\mathbb R}. Let Unip(O0)\mathrm{Unip}'(\mathcal{O}_0) denote the specified class of unipotent representations attached to a nilpotent orbit O0\mathcal{O}_0, and let Aq(λ)A_{\mathfrak{q}}(\lambda) denote cohomologically induced modules.

Cohomological-building-block conjecture. There exist a θ\theta-stable parabolic q=lu\mathfrak{q}=\mathfrak{l}\oplus\mathfrak{u} such that

LRSp(p0,q0)×U(p1,q1)××U(pr,qr),L_{\mathbb R}\simeq \mathrm{Sp}(p_0,q_0)\times\mathrm{U}(p_1,q_1)\times\cdots\times\mathrm{U}(p_r,q_r),

a representation π0Unip(O0)\pi_0\in\mathrm{Unip}'(\mathcal{O}_0) for some nilpotent orbit of Sp(p0,q0)\mathrm{Sp}(p_0,q_0), and weakly fair Aq(λ)A_{\mathfrak{q}}(\lambda) modules πi\pi_i for U(pi,qi)\mathrm{U}(p_i,q_i), 1ir1\leq i\leq r, such that π\pi is cohomologically induced from

π0π1πr\pi_0\boxtimes\pi_1\boxtimes\cdots\boxtimes\pi_r

in the weakly fair range.

The conjecture proposes that the unitary dual with integral infinitesimal character is assembled from unipotent representations for smaller symplectic groups and weakly fair cohomologically induced modules for unitary factors. The supplied evidence says that all representations appearing in the conjecture are unitary, but leaves open whether this construction is exhaustive.

Progress summary

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Dan M. Barbasch and Peter E. Trapa, “Unitarity of Unipotent Representations of Sp(p,q) and SO*(2n)”, arXiv:1806.07770 (2018).

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.