Exceptional-set growth conjecture for Goldbach representations in progressions

At least 10 years old · documented by

Assume mm is even, and let (Z/mZ)×(\mathbb Z/m\mathbb Z)^\times denote the invertible residue classes. For admissible a,b∈(Z/mZ)×a,b\in(\mathbb Z/m\mathbb Z)^\times, let Ea,b,mE_{a,b,m} be the set of positive even n≡a+b(modm)n\equiv a+b\pmod m that cannot be written as n=p+qn=p+q with primes p≡a(modm)p\equiv a\pmod m and q≡b(modm)q\equiv b\pmod m. Define

Emax⁡(m):=max⁡{n∈Ea,b,m:a,b∈(Z/mZ)×}E_{\max}(m):=\max\{n\in E_{a,b,m}:a,b\in(\mathbb Z/m\mathbb Z)^\times\}

and

Lavg(m):=1ϕ(m)2∑a,b∈(Z/mZ)×∣Ea,b,m∣.L_{\mathrm{avg}}(m):=\frac{1}{\phi(m)^2}\sum_{a,b\in(\mathbb Z/m\mathbb Z)^\times}|E_{a,b,m}|.

Exceptional-set growth conjecture. As m→∞m\to\infty,

Emax⁡(m)=O(m2(log⁡m)2),Lavg(m)=O(mε)for every ε>0.E_{\max}(m)=O\bigl(m^2(\log m)^2\bigr),\qquad L_{\mathrm{avg}}(m)=O(m^\varepsilon)\quad\text{for every }\varepsilon>0.

The conjecture is motivated by heuristic arguments and numerical data, which suggest roughly quadratic growth for Emax⁡(m)E_{\max}(m). Analytic methods in the paper do not establish even finiteness of all the exceptional sets, so these bounds remain open.

References

Primary source

Kimball Martin, “Refined Goldbach conjectures with primes in progressions”, arXiv:1806.00946 (2018).

Additional references

2 papers in this index state this conjecture (2015–2018). The statement above is taken from the most recent of them; the others are arXiv:1508.05967.

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.