Edelman–Greene maximality and height conjecture

From papers

Let QSYT(scn)Q\in\mathrm{SYT}(\mathrm{sc}_n), let c(Q)c(Q) be its column word, let PQ\mathcal{P}_Q be the associated poset, and let EG1(Q)\mathrm{EG}^{-1}(Q) be its inverse Edelman–Greene image. Let h(P)h(P) denote the length of the longest chain in a poset PP, and define

Q=h([c(Q),EG1(Q)]).\ell_Q=h\left([c(Q),\mathrm{EG}^{-1}(Q)]\right).

Edelman–Greene height conjecture. The word EG1(Q)\mathrm{EG}^{-1}(Q) is a maximal element of PQ\mathcal{P}_Q, and

Q=i=1len(c(Q))(EG1(Q)ic(Q)i).\ell_Q=\sum_{i=1}^{\operatorname{len}(c(Q))}\left(\mathrm{EG}^{-1}(Q)_i-c(Q)_i\right).

The first assertion restates the preceding maximality conjecture, while the equality is motivated by computations for QSYT(scn)Q\in\mathrm{SYT}(\mathrm{sc}_n). The source notes that the maximal element is not generally unique and gives no evidence that the height equality has been proved.

Progress summary

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Svante Linusson and Samu Potka, “Properties of the Edelman-Greene bijection”, arXiv:1804.10034 (2019).

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.