The strict inequality conjecture for critical and unification probabilities on non-amenable graphs

Let Γ\Gamma be a connected, locally finite graph. The critical probability is

pc(Γ):=inf{p[0,1]:with positive probability ω has some infinite cluster},p_\mathrm c(\Gamma):=\inf\{p\in[0,1]:\text{with positive probability }\omega\text{ has some infinite cluster}\},

and the unification probability is

pu(Γ):=inf{p[0,1]:almost surely there is a unique infinite cluster in ω}.p_\mathrm u(\Gamma):=\inf\{p\in[0,1]:\text{almost surely there is a unique infinite cluster in }\omega\}.

A graph is non-amenable if there is a constant Φ>0\Phi>0 such that every non-empty finite vertex set KK satisfies bdKΦK|\operatorname{bd} K|\geq \Phi|K|, and it is quasi-transitive if its automorphism group has finitely many vertex orbits.

Strict inequality conjecture. If Γ\Gamma is non-amenable and quasi-transitive, then

pc(Γ)<pu(Γ).p_\mathrm c(\Gamma)<p_\mathrm u(\Gamma).

The inequality asserts that, on every non-amenable quasi-transitive graph, there is a nonempty interval of parameters in which infinitely many infinite clusters coexist. The converse to the known fact that amenable transitive graphs have at most one infinite cluster almost surely would establish a sharp distinction between amenable and non-amenable percolation, but the conjecture remains open in the source.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Jan Czajkowski, “One-point boundaries of ends of clusters in percolation in H^d”, arXiv:1804.05948 (2018).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.