Berrizbeitia–Medina–Moll–Moll–Noble conjecture on p-adic valuations of Stirling numbers

From papers

Let kk be a positive integer and let pp be a prime with k<pk<p. For positive integers mm, define

Lpm=(p1)plogpk+m2.L_{p^m}=(p-1)p^{\lceil\log_p k\rceil+m-2}.

Call a congruence class [a]d[a]_d constant when the relevant pp-adic valuation of S(n,k)S(n,k) is independent of n[a]dn\in[a]_d, and non-constant otherwise.

Berrizbeitia–Medina–Moll–Moll–Noble conjecture. Fix a positive integer kk and a prime number pp such that k<pk<p. Then there exist m0(k)N+m_0(k)\in\mathbb{N}_+ and μ(k)N\mu(k)\in\mathbb{N} such that for any integer mm0(k)m\geq m_0(k) there are exactly μ(k)\mu(k) non-constant congruence classes [a]Lpm[a]_{L_{p^m}} modulo LpmL_{p^m}, and each non-constant class modulo LpmL_{p^m} splits into p1p-1 constant and one non-constant class modulo Lpm+1L_{p^{m+1}}.

This conjecture generalizes the preceding 22-adic conjecture to arbitrary primes under the hypothesis k<pk<p. The supplied status evidence says that the fact was proved by Gessel and Lengyel when k/pk/p is not an odd integer; since k<pk<p, that condition holds here, so the conjecture is solved.

Progress summary

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Piotr Miska, “A note on p-adic locally analytic functions with application to behavior of the p-adic valuations of Stirling numbers”, arXiv:1803.04533 (2018).

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.