Jahanbekam–West anti-Ramsey conjecture for edge-disjoint rainbow spanning trees

About 8 years old · traced to

For positive integers nn and tt, let r(n,t)r(n,t) be the maximum number of colors in an edge-coloring of KnK_n that has no tt edge-disjoint rainbow spanning trees. Jahanbekam–West conjecture. Whenever n≥2t+2≥6n\geq 2t+2\geq 6,

r(n,t)=(n−22)+t.r(n,t)=\binom{n-2}{2}+t.

This is an anti-Ramsey extremal problem. The source states that the conjecture is resolved by the paper's main theorem, so the displayed formula holds in the indicated range.

References

Primary source

Linyuan Lu and Zhiyu Wang, “Anti-Ramsey number of edge-disjoint rainbow spanning trees”, arXiv:1802.08918 (2019).

Progress summary

Refreshed
Claimed solved

A 2018 paper by Linyuan Lu and Zhiyu Wang reports that the conjectured maximum is correct in the stated range and also settles the boundary cases.

Jahanbekam and West proposed the conjecture in 2016. It predicts the exact largest number of colors possible without tt edge-disjoint rainbow spanning trees when n≥2t+2≥6n\geq 2t+2\geq 6.

Known results

  • The case t=1t=1 was established by Bialostocki and Voxman.
  • The case t=2t=2 was established by Akbari and Alipour.
  • Jahanbekam and West supplied the lower-bound constructions.

February 24, 2018 claimed resolution

Lu and Wang’s paper Anti-Ramsey number of edge-disjoint rainbow spanning trees states that it proves

r(n,t)=(n−22)+tr(n,t)=\binom{n-2}{2}+t

for n≥2t+2≥6n\geq 2t+2\geq 6, matching the conjecture. It also claims to determine the boundary cases n=2t+1n=2t+1 and n=2tn=2t, so the full problem is settled according to the paper; this resolution is unverified in this summary.

Current status (as of September 2026): The conjecture is claimed proved, with no unresolved cases reported in its stated range, but this automated summary does not independently verify the proof.

Sources

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.