Lehmann–Tanimoto's geometric consistency conjecture for Manin's conjecture

About 9 years old · traced to

Let XX be a smooth projective uniruled variety over a number field FF. Let LL be the line bundle used to define the Fujita invariant a(X,L)a(X,L) and the bb-constant. For a smooth projective variety YY and a generically finite FF-morphism f:Y→Xf:Y\to X, compare the pairs (a(Y,f∗L),b(Y,f∗L))(a(Y,f^*L),b(Y,f^*L)) and (a(X,L),b(X,L))(a(X,L),b(X,L)) in lexicographic order.

Lehmann–Tanimoto's conjecture. Considering all such morphisms ff for which f∗Lf^*L is not big or

(a(Y,f∗L),b(Y,f∗L))>(a(X,L),b(X,L)),(a(Y,f^*L),b(Y,f^*L))>(a(X,L),b(X,L)),

the union of their rational images satisfies

⋃ff(Y(F))⊂Z\bigcup_f f(Y(F))\subset Z

for some thin subset Z⊂XZ\subset X.

This conjecture asserts that generically finite covers with geometrically incompatible invariants do not obstruct the thin-set version of Manin's conjecture. It is attributed in the source to Lehmann and Tanimoto and is presented as an open conjecture.

References

Primary source

Akash Kumar Sengupta, “Manin's Conjecture and the Fujita invariant of finite covers”, arXiv:1712.07780 (2018).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.