Lehmann–Tanimoto's geometric consistency conjecture for Manin's conjecture

Let XX be a smooth projective uniruled variety over a number field FF. Let LL be the line bundle used to define the Fujita invariant a(X,L)a(X,L) and the bb-constant. For a smooth projective variety YY and a generically finite FF-morphism f:YXf:Y\to X, compare the pairs (a(Y,fL),b(Y,fL))(a(Y,f^*L),b(Y,f^*L)) and (a(X,L),b(X,L))(a(X,L),b(X,L)) in lexicographic order.

Lehmann–Tanimoto's conjecture. Considering all such morphisms ff for which fLf^*L is not big or

(a(Y,fL),b(Y,fL))>(a(X,L),b(X,L)),(a(Y,f^*L),b(Y,f^*L))>(a(X,L),b(X,L)),

the union of their rational images satisfies

ff(Y(F))Z\bigcup_f f(Y(F))\subset Z

for some thin subset ZXZ\subset X.

This conjecture asserts that generically finite covers with geometrically incompatible invariants do not obstruct the thin-set version of Manin's conjecture. It is attributed in the source to Lehmann and Tanimoto and is presented as an open conjecture.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Akash Kumar Sengupta, “Manin's Conjecture and the Fujita invariant of finite covers”, arXiv:1712.07780 (2018).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.