The at-most-two non-real zeros conjecture for normalised polynomial sequences

About 9 years old · traced to

Let {Wn(z)}n\{W_n(z)\}_n be a normalised polynomial sequence satisfying the recurrence

Wn(z)=(az+b)Wn−1(z)+(cz+d)Wn−2(z),W_n(z)=(az+b)W_{n-1}(z)+(cz+d)W_{n-2}(z),

with a,b,d<0a,b,d<0 and c>0c>0. A normalised polynomial sequence is one whose recurrence and initial polynomials satisfy the normalisation specified in the paper.

At-most-two non-real zeros conjecture. Every polynomial Wn(z)W_n(z) has at most two non-real zeros.

This conjecture is proposed as a generalisation of the paper's real-rootedness results. It is partially supported by the theorem asserting real-rootedness of every Wn(z)W_n(z) when cc is sufficiently large, but its validity for all c>0c>0 remains open.

References

Primary source

David G. L. Wang and Jiarui Zhang, “Piecewise interlacing zeros of polynomials”, arXiv:1712.04225 (2018).

Progress summary

Refreshed
Claimed progress

A submitted argument claims to prove the conjecture in full, but no independent verification has been found.

The conjecture asks whether every polynomial in the specified recurrence sequence has at most two non-real zeros. The retrieved published material records only partial real-rootedness results, not a resolution of the full claim.

Known results

Wang and Zhang proved that every WnW_n is real-rooted under the sufficient condition Δg=(b+c)2+4d(1−a)>0\Delta_g=(b+c)^2+4d(1-a)>0; this does not cover all c>0c>0.

Community submission (unverified), August 25, 2026

A submitted proof argues that a symmetric tridiagonal matrix representation of Wn(x)W_n(x), combined with endpoint inertia, gives at least n−2n-2 distinct real zeros in (−∞,−d/c)(-\infty,-d/c); since deg⁡Wn=n\deg W_n=n, it claims the conjecture follows.

Current status (as of August 2026): The published record leaves the conjecture open, while the August 25, 2026 submitted proof claim remains unverified.

Sources

Solutions 1

ProofThis solution needs a summarySee full solutionHide full solution

A stronger localization theorem

Let

A(x)=ax+b,B(x)=cx+d,a,b,d<0<c,A(x)=ax+b, \qquad B(x)=cx+d, \qquad a,b,d<0<c,

and define

W0(x)=1,W1(x)=x,Wn(x)=A(x)Wn−1(x)+B(x)Wn−2(x)(n≥2).W_0(x)=1, \qquad W_1(x)=x, \qquad W_n(x)=A(x)W_{n-1}(x)+B(x)W_{n-2}(x) \quad(n\geq2).

In fact, for every n≥2n\geq2, the polynomial WnW_n has at least n−2n-2 distinct real zeros in

(−∞,−dc).(1)\left(-\infty,-\frac dc\right). \tag{1}

Because deg⁡Wn=n\deg W_n=n, it follows that WnW_n has at most two nonreal zeros. This proves the conjecture, including its full range of real parameters.

A symmetric tridiagonal representation

Put

ξ=−dc>0.\xi=-\frac dc>0.

For x<ξx<\xi, define

t(x)=−B(x)=−cx−d>0t(x)=\sqrt{-B(x)}=\sqrt{-cx-d}>0

and consider the real symmetric n×nn\times n matrix

Jn(x)=(xt(x)0⋯0t(x)A(x)t(x)⋱⋮0t(x)A(x)⋱0⋮⋱⋱⋱t(x)0⋯0t(x)A(x)).(2)J_n(x)= \begin{pmatrix} x&t(x)&0&\cdots&0\\ t(x)&A(x)&t(x)&\ddots&\vdots\\ 0&t(x)&A(x)&\ddots&0\\ \vdots&\ddots&\ddots&\ddots&t(x)\\ 0&\cdots&0&t(x)&A(x) \end{pmatrix}. \tag{2}

Write Dk(x)D_k(x) for the determinant of its leading k×kk\times k principal submatrix and set D0(x)=1D_0(x)=1. Expansion along the last row gives

D1(x)=x,Dk(x)=A(x)Dk−1(x)−t(x)2Dk−2(x)(k≥2).D_1(x)=x, \qquad D_k(x)=A(x)D_{k-1}(x)-t(x)^2D_{k-2}(x) \quad(k\geq2).

Since −t(x)2=B(x)-t(x)^2=B(x), these are exactly the defining initial conditions and recurrence for WkW_k. Therefore,

det⁡Jn(x)=Wn(x)(x<ξ).(3)\boxed{\det J_n(x)=W_n(x)} \qquad(x<\xi). \tag{3}

Endpoint inertia

Let ν+(M)\nu_+(M) denote the number of strictly positive eigenvalues of a real symmetric matrix MM, counted with multiplicity. The matrix in (2) extends continuously to x=ξx=\xi, where t(ξ)=0t(\xi)=0. Since

ξ>0,A(ξ)=aξ+b<0,\xi>0, \qquad A(\xi)=a\xi+b<0,

we have

Jn(ξ)=diag⁡(ξ,A(ξ),…,A(ξ)),ν+(Jn(ξ))=1.(4)J_n(\xi) =\operatorname{diag}\bigl(\xi,A(\xi),\ldots,A(\xi)\bigr), \qquad \nu_+\bigl(J_n(\xi)\bigr)=1. \tag{4}

At the other end, set x=−Rx=-R and let R→∞R\to\infty. Then

x=−R,A(−R)=(−a)R+b,t(−R)=cR−d.x=-R, \qquad A(-R)=(-a)R+b, \qquad t(-R)=\sqrt{cR-d}.

Because −a>0-a>0, for every sufficiently large RR,

−R+cR−d<0,(−a)R+b−2cR−d>0.(5)-R+\sqrt{cR-d}<0, \qquad (-a)R+b-2\sqrt{cR-d}>0. \tag{5}

The Gershgorin interval corresponding to the first row of Jn(−R)J_n(-R) lies entirely in (−∞,0)( -\infty,0), whereas all the other Gershgorin intervals lie entirely in (0,∞)(0,\infty). Since these two collections are disjoint, their eigenvalue counts equal the numbers of corresponding rows. Consequently,

ν+(Jn(−R))=n−1(6)\nu_+\bigl(J_n(-R)\bigr)=n-1 \tag{6}

for all sufficiently large RR.

Counting the crossings

For every x<ξx<\xi, all off-diagonal entries of Jn(x)J_n(x) are strictly positive. Hence

dim⁡ker⁡Jn(x)≤1.(7)\dim\ker J_n(x)\leq1. \tag{7}

Indeed, the first component of a vector in the kernel determines its second component from the first row, and each subsequent row determines the next component uniquely. If the first component is zero, this recursion forces every component to vanish.

The eigenvalues of Jn(x)J_n(x) vary continuously with xx. Its positive inertia can change only when Jn(x)J_n(x) is singular, which by (3) is equivalent to

Wn(x)=0.W_n(x)=0.

At any such point, (7) shows that at most one eigenvalue can cross zero. Therefore each distinct real zero in (−R,ξ)(-R,\xi) changes ν+\nu_+ by at most one. Equations (4) and (6) give the total change

∣ν+(Jn(−R))−ν+(Jn(ξ))∣=n−2.\left| \nu_+\bigl(J_n(-R)\bigr) -\nu_+\bigl(J_n(\xi)\bigr) \right| =n-2.

Thus WnW_n has at least n−2n-2 distinct real zeros in (−R,ξ)(-R,\xi), and therefore in the interval (1).

Finally, the recurrence shows that

deg⁡Wn=n,[xn]Wn(x)=an−1≠0(n≥1).\deg W_n=n, \qquad [x^n]W_n(x)=a^{n-1}\neq0 \quad(n\geq1).

At most two zeros can remain outside the n−2n-2 distinct real zeros already located. Since WnW_n has real coefficients, any nonreal zeros form one conjugate pair. Hence every WnW_n has at most two nonreal zeros, as asserted.

D. G. L. Wang and Jiarui Zhang, Piecewise interlacing zeros of polynomials, Conjecture 5.2.