Ikeda's non-vanishing conjecture for Miyawaki liftings

Let kk be positive and even, let fS2k2(n+r)(SL2(Z))f \in S_{2k-2(n+r)}(\operatorname{SL}_2(\mathbb{Z})) be a normalized Hecke eigenform, let F(2n+2r)F^{(2n+2r)} be its Ikeda lift, and let gSk(Spr(Z))g \in S_k(\operatorname{Sp}_r(\mathbb{Z})) be a Hecke eigenform. Write M(2n+r)(g,F(2n+2r))\mathcal{M}^{(2n+r)}(g,F^{(2n+2r)}) for the Miyawaki lift. Ikeda's conjecture.

  1. When n=0n=0, the Miyawaki lift M(r)(g,F(2r))\mathcal{M}^{(r)}(g,F^{(2r)}) is nonzero if and only if the central value of L(s,st(g)f)L(s,\operatorname{st}(g)\boxtimes f) is nonzero.
  2. When n>0n>0, the Miyawaki lift M(2n+r)(g,F(2n+2r))\mathcal{M}^{(2n+r)}(g,F^{(2n+2r)}) is always nonzero.

Ikeda proved that a nonzero Miyawaki lift has the expected standard LL-function. The non-vanishing asserted here is still open and is the mechanism intended to establish Miyawaki's prediction.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Hiraku Atobe, “A theory of Miyawaki liftings: The Hilbert-Siegel case”, arXiv:1712.03624 (2018).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.