Nori's conjecture on algebraic correspondences for the transcendental motive

Let TT be the smooth projective threefold considered under Hypothesis, and let t3(T)t_3(T) denote its transcendental degree-three motive. Write M(L,t3(T))\mathcal{M}(\mathbb{L},t_3(T)) for morphisms from the Lefschetz motive L\mathbb{L} to t3(T)t_3(T), and let Malg(L,t3(T))\mathcal{M}_{\operatorname{alg}}(\mathbb{L},t_3(T)) denote the subgroup represented by algebraic correspondences. Nori's conjecture. The map

M(L,t3(T))Malg(L,t3(T))\mathcal{M}(\mathbb{L},t_3(T))\to \mathcal{M}_{\operatorname{alg}}(\mathbb{L},t_3(T))

is bijective. This conjecture concerns whether all morphisms in the relevant category of motives are represented by algebraic correspondences. The paper states that it should be traced back to Nori, but gives no reference; it also notes that the claim follows from the Bloch--Beilinson--Murre conjectures.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Bruno Kahn, “Albanese kernels and Griffiths groups”, arXiv:1711.04335 (2020).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.