Restricted QUE conjecture for Hecke–Maass cusp forms

Let uju_j be a Hecke–Maass cusp form with Laplace eigenvalue 1/4+Tj21/4+T_j^2, Hecke eigenvalues λuj(m)\lambda_{u_j}(m), parity uj(x+iy)=δjuj(x+iy)u_j(-x+iy)=\delta_j u_j(x+iy) with δj{1,1}\delta_j\in\{-1,1\}, and normalization

Γ\Huj(z)2dxdyy2=vol(Γ\H)=π3.\int_{\Gamma\backslash\mathbb H}|u_j(z)|^2\frac{dx\,dy}{y^2}=\operatorname{vol}(\Gamma\backslash\mathbb H)=\frac{\pi}{3}.

Let ψ\psi and the remaining parameters satisfy the conditions of the theorem being analogized, and let Bq(s,uj)B_q(s,u_j) be the finite Euler product specified in the source. Restricted QUE conjecture for Hecke–Maass cusp forms. As TjT_j\to\infty,

0ψ2(y)uj(x+iy)2dyy0ψ2(y)[1+δjBq(1,uj)J0(θTjy)]dyy.\int_0^\infty \psi^2(y)|u_j(x+iy)|^2\frac{dy}{y}\sim\int_0^\infty \psi^2(y)\left[1+\delta_j B_q(1,u_j)J_0\left(\frac{\theta T_j}{y}\right)\right]\frac{dy}{y}.

This is proposed as an analogue for Maass cusp forms of the paper’s restricted quantum unique ergodicity result for Eisenstein series. The source notes that restricted QUE is more difficult than standard QUE; the status of this precise asymptotic is not resolved in the supplied text.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Matthew P Young, “Equidistribution of Eisenstein series on geodesic segments”, arXiv:1711.03944 (2018).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.