Brumer–Kramer Paramodular Conjecture

Let AA range over isogeny classes of abelian surfaces over Q\mathbf{Q} of conductor NN with EndQA=Z\operatorname{End}_{\mathbf{Q}} A=\mathbf{Z}. Let K(N)K(N) be the paramodular group

K(N)=γM4(Z)γ1Sp4(Q),γ=diag[1,1,1,N].K(N)=\gamma M_4(\mathbf{Z})\gamma^{-1}\cap\operatorname{Sp}_4(\mathbf{Q}),\qquad \gamma=\operatorname{diag}[1,1,1,N].

A weight-22 Siegel modular form FF is required not to lie in the space spanned by the Saito–Kurokawa lifts, to have level K(N)K(N), and to have rational eigenvalues; forms are considered up to scalar multiplication. Brumer–Kramer Paramodular Conjecture. There is a one-to-one correspondence between these isogeny classes and such forms FF. Moreover, the LL-series of AA and FF should agree, and for every prime pp not dividing NN, the pp-adic representation

Vp(A):=Tp(A)QpV_p(A):=T_p(A)\otimes\mathbf{Q}_p

of AA should be isomorphic to the representation associated to FF, where Tp(A)T_p(A) is the pp-adic Tate module. This conjecture refines Yoshida's correspondence by specifying the paramodular level and the associated arithmetic data; the paper applies deformation-theoretic methods to establish modularity in particular cases, while the full correspondence remains open.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Tobias Berger and Krzysztof Klosin, “Deformations of Saito-Kurokawa type and the Paramodular Conjecture (with an appendix by Cris Poor, Jerry Shurman, and David S. Yuen)”, arXiv:1710.10228 (2019).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.