Provisional Bessel K decomposition conjecture for the Riemann zeta function

At least 8 years old · documented by

Let r∈{1,2,3}r\in\{1,2,3\}, let ζ∗(s,r)\zeta^{*}(s,r) be the completed zeta function defined in the paper, and let ar(n)a_r(n) and br(n)b_r(n) be the coefficient sequences introduced by the theta-function expansions. For j≥1j\geq 1, define

cj(s,r)=∑d∣jar(d)br(jd)(jd2)rs+2−r4.c_j(s,r)=\sum_{d\mid j}a_r(d)b_r\left(\frac{j}{d}\right)\left(\frac{j}{d^2}\right)^{\frac{rs+2-r}{4}}.

Let KνK_\nu denote the modified Bessel function of the second kind. The provisional Bessel K decomposition conjecture. For r=1,2,3r=1,2,3,

ζ∗(s,r)=−(Ψr(s)s+Ψr(1−s)1−s),\zeta^{*}(s,r)=-\left(\frac{\Psi_r(s)}{s}+\frac{\Psi_r(1-s)}{1-s}\right),

where

Ψr(s)=2π∑j=1∞cj(s,r)Krs+2−r2(2πj).\Psi_r(s)=2\pi\sum_{j=1}^{\infty}c_j(s,r)K_{\frac{rs+2-r}{2}}(2\pi\sqrt{j}).

The result is provisional because the paper does not justify the interchange of the sum and integral used in its derivation; it is intended to provide Bessel expansions for the zeta functions under consideration.

References

Primary source

Timothy Redmond and Charles Ryavec, “BesselK Series for the Riemann Zeta function”, arXiv:1710.09987 (2019).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.