The x not 1 modulo k−1 conjecture for prographs and set-valued tableaux

Assume xa(modk1)x\equiv a\pmod{k-1}, where 2ak12\leq a\leq k-1. Let

λ=(n+x+ka1k1,n+x+ka1k1,m),μ=(x+ka1k1,0,0),\lambda=\left(n+\frac{x+k-a-1}{k-1},n+\frac{x+k-a-1}{k-1},m\right),\qquad \mu=\left(\frac{x+k-a-1}{k-1},0,0\right),

and let PCxk(n,m)\operatorname{PC}_x^k(n,m) denote the relevant prographs and S(λ/μ,ρ)\operatorname{\mathbb{S}}(\lambda/\mu,\rho) the corresponding set-valued Young tableaux. For TS(λ/μ,ρ)T\in\operatorname{\mathbb{S}}(\lambda/\mu,\rho), write b1<b2<b_1<b_2<\cdots for its middle-row entries and c1<c2<c_1<c_2<\cdots for its bottom-row entries. The x not 1 modulo k1k-1 conjecture. The set PCxk(n,m)\operatorname{PC}_x^k(n,m) is in bijection with the subset of tableaux in S(λ/μ,ρ)\operatorname{\mathbb{S}}(\lambda/\mu,\rho) satisfying

bi=ifor all 1ika,b_i=i\quad\text{for all }1\leq i\leq k-a,

and

ci>b(k1)i+2(ka)for all 1im1.c_i>b_{(k-1)i+2-(k-a)}\quad\text{for all }1\leq i\leq m-1.

The first condition excludes tableaux corresponding to the kak-a leftmost children of the initial coproduct terminating at a coproduct node; the second excludes those edges serving as inputs to a product other than the final product. The proposed bijection refines the general prograph–tableau correspondence, but the source gives no resolution of the conjecture.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Paul Drube, Maxwell Krueger, Ashley Skalsky and Meghan Wren, “Set-Valued Young Tableaux and Product-Coproduct Prographs”, arXiv:1710.02709 (2018).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.