The x not 1 modulo k−1 conjecture for prographs and set-valued tableaux

About 9 years old · traced to

Assume x≡a(modk−1)x\equiv a\pmod{k-1}, where 2≤a≤k−12\leq a\leq k-1. Let

λ=(n+x+k−a−1k−1,n+x+k−a−1k−1,m),μ=(x+k−a−1k−1,0,0),\lambda=\left(n+\frac{x+k-a-1}{k-1},n+\frac{x+k-a-1}{k-1},m\right),\qquad \mu=\left(\frac{x+k-a-1}{k-1},0,0\right),

and let PC⁡xk(n,m)\operatorname{PC}_x^k(n,m) denote the relevant prographs and S⁡(λ/μ,ρ)\operatorname{\mathbb{S}}(\lambda/\mu,\rho) the corresponding set-valued Young tableaux. For T∈S⁡(λ/μ,ρ)T\in\operatorname{\mathbb{S}}(\lambda/\mu,\rho), write b1<b2<⋯b_1<b_2<\cdots for its middle-row entries and c1<c2<⋯c_1<c_2<\cdots for its bottom-row entries. The x not 1 modulo k−1k-1 conjecture. The set PC⁡xk(n,m)\operatorname{PC}_x^k(n,m) is in bijection with the subset of tableaux in S⁡(λ/μ,ρ)\operatorname{\mathbb{S}}(\lambda/\mu,\rho) satisfying

bi=ifor all 1≤i≤k−a,b_i=i\quad\text{for all }1\leq i\leq k-a,

and

ci>b(k−1)i+2−(k−a)for all 1≤i≤m−1.c_i>b_{(k-1)i+2-(k-a)}\quad\text{for all }1\leq i\leq m-1.

The first condition excludes tableaux corresponding to the k−ak-a leftmost children of the initial coproduct terminating at a coproduct node; the second excludes those edges serving as inputs to a product other than the final product. The proposed bijection refines the general prograph–tableau correspondence, but the source gives no resolution of the conjecture.

References

Primary source

Paul Drube, Maxwell Krueger, Ashley Skalsky and Meghan Wren, “Set-Valued Young Tableaux and Product-Coproduct Prographs”, arXiv:1710.02709 (2018).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.