The Kleiman-Piene conjecture for nodal curves

About 9 years old · traced to

Let BB be a family of curves satisfying the hypotheses DIMKP{\bf DIM}_{\mathrm{KP}}: the locus of non-reduced curves has codimension greater than δ\delta, and for every equisingularity type D\mathbf{D}, the locus B(D)B(\mathbf{D}) has either at least the expected codimension cod⁡(D)\operatorname{cod}(\mathbf{D}) or codimension greater than δ\delta. Let B(δ)B(\delta) denote the locus of δ\delta-nodal curves. Under these hypotheses, there is a natural non-negative cycle U(δ)U(\delta) supported on B(δ)‾\overline{B(\delta)}. Kleiman-Piene conjecture. The locus B(δ)B(\delta) is either empty or has pure codimension δ\delta, and the rational equivalence class [U(δ)][U(\delta)] is given by the universal polynomial in the classes ϵ(a,b,c)\epsilon(a,b,c) asserted by the Kleiman-Piene theorem for every δ≥0\delta\geq 0. Kleiman and Piene proved this statement for δ≤8\delta\leq 8; the conjecture extends their universal-polynomial formula and codimension assertion to all numbers of nodes.

References

Primary source

Ties Laarakker, “The Kleiman-Piene Conjecture and node polynomials for plane curves in P^3”, arXiv:1710.02085 (2017).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.