The Kleiman-Piene conjecture for nodal curves

From papers

Let BB be a family of curves satisfying the hypotheses DIMKP{\bf DIM}_{\mathrm{KP}}: the locus of non-reduced curves has codimension greater than δ\delta, and for every equisingularity type D\mathbf{D}, the locus B(D)B(\mathbf{D}) has either at least the expected codimension cod(D)\operatorname{cod}(\mathbf{D}) or codimension greater than δ\delta. Let B(δ)B(\delta) denote the locus of δ\delta-nodal curves. Under these hypotheses, there is a natural non-negative cycle U(δ)U(\delta) supported on B(δ)\overline{B(\delta)}. Kleiman-Piene conjecture. The locus B(δ)B(\delta) is either empty or has pure codimension δ\delta, and the rational equivalence class [U(δ)][U(\delta)] is given by the universal polynomial in the classes ϵ(a,b,c)\epsilon(a,b,c) asserted by the Kleiman-Piene theorem for every δ0\delta\geq 0. Kleiman and Piene proved this statement for δ8\delta\leq 8; the conjecture extends their universal-polynomial formula and codimension assertion to all numbers of nodes.

Progress summary

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Ties Laarakker, “The Kleiman-Piene Conjecture and node polynomials for plane curves in P^3”, arXiv:1710.02085 (2017).

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.