PEPS boundary-state locality necessity conjecture

About 9 years old · traced to

Let Λ\Lambda be the underlying lattice, let A⊂ΛA\subset\Lambda be any rectangular region, and let HAH_A denote the corresponding parent Hamiltonian restricted to AA. A boundary state is the effective state associated with the boundary of such a region. PEPS boundary-state locality conjecture. If HAH_A is gapped for any rectangular region A⊂ΛA\subset\Lambda, then the boundary states of AA are close to a Gibbs state of a one-dimensional Hamiltonian with exponentially decaying interactions, and they are approximately factorizable.

This conjecture asks whether the boundary-state assumptions sufficient for proving a bulk gap are also necessary. It is motivated by local indistinguishability, LTQO, recovery-map results, and numerical evidence, but the source states that no proof is currently available.

References

Primary source

Michael J. Kastoryano, Angelo Lucia and David Perez-Garcia, “Locality at the boundary implies gap in the bulk for 2D PEPS”, arXiv:1709.07691 (2018).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.